Women that had very early coital first (gender ahead of decades sixteen) were 2
Sheer and you will cousin frequencies (Letter and %) was indeed received into distributions of chosen details to the a couple of groups: Individuals who stated previously that have an excellent Pap smear make sure men and women whom don’t. The entire association figure was applied to choose differences in new withdrawals regarding selected details by the a couple groups. Pattern try examined for the Mantel-Haenszel chi-rectangular try. Possibility percentages (ORs) and you will 95% believe periods (CIs) had been made once the procedures out-of relationship for everybody parameters of the a few teams. Each other harsh and you can adjusted measures of organization were made for everybody variables. All ORs and you may CIs was in fact determined away from logistic regression equations. Shed values was basically omitted about investigation. The analysis are used having Analytical Studies Application (SAS), adaptation 9.step 3 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Most of the advertised P-values are two-tailed.
Had good pap smudge
Towards the last adjusted model to own Pap smear reputation [ Table step one ], the mathematically tall details from the number 1 analyses was basically entered on the a logistic regression model. Backward stepwise logistic regression try did. Details with a mathematical requirement for P Dining table 2 . Approximately 66% (265 from 403) of one’s investigation population got an effective Pap smear and only 16% had an effective Pap sample in the last 12 months. There had been extreme differences (P Desk step three suggests education, attitudes, and you will strategies on the cervical malignant tumors and you may Pap smudge tests. On the 66% of one’s women that had actually ever gotten a great Pap smudge got went along to a doctor over and over again a year compared with 54% of women who had never really had a good Pap smudge (P = 0.05). Read more →
