The new head paths of deal with-to-deal with and you can Myspace friends to help you health were not extreme
The latest direct effect of deal with-to-face relatives to help you wellness try ? = -0.14 (letter.s.) in addition to head effect of Myspace family relations in order to health try ? = 0.09 (letter.s.). Although not, the secondary roadway anywhere between face-to-face friendship and wellness was high. We located high associations ranging from face-to-deal with family unit members, connection and you can bridging. Brand new lead aftereffect of face-to-deal with family relations to connection is ? = 0.44, p ? 0.001, in order to connecting are ? = 0.70, p ? 0.001; and you will each other connecting and you can bridging was positively and you can notably pertaining to health, ? = 0.79, p ? 0.001, and you may ? = 0.17, p ? 0.05, respectively. A different sort of impact try receive getting Twitter family, which had a low-tall connection that have connecting and you can a critical but negative organization having bonding, ? = -0.09, (n.s.) and you will ? = -0.34, p ? 0.01, respectively. An entire mediation design accounted for 62% of one’s explained variance from wellness. Regression weight are ? = 0.37 into the organization ranging from face-to-deal with nearest and dearest and you can health insurance and ? = -0.19 on the relationship between Twitter family and health.
Model dos
One minute model is actually projected to understand more about the newest direct connection between Fb and you will deal with-to-face loved ones and you can health, nested inside the earlier mediation. This new design is actually estimated constraining the mediation routes to help you no. The fresh constrained nested design fit try ? dos = , DF = 160; ? 2 /DF = 5.twenty six, NFI = 0.90; CFI = 0.91; RMSEA = 0.07 (90% confidence interval [CI] [0.07,0.08]) and it is actually notably worse (p ? 0.001) than the complement of your unconstrained model advertised on Model step one part.
In comparison to Design 1, face-to-deal with relationship was a serious direct predictor off fitness, ? = 0.24, p ? 0.01. Read more →